Richard Brody, in the 16 December 2013 issue of The New Yorker, wrote an essay on the films of George Cukor. I watched A star is born, but could not abide watching it all (his own greatest artistic achievement and also that of Judy Garland, its star.). I watched Rich and Famous, and did finish it.
Brody: An esteemed raconteur, Cukor started to write his autobiography, but his
lifelong reticence got in the way, and he made his last film, “Rich and
Famous” (1981), as if to explain: it’s a deceptively chirpy comedy
starring Candice Bergen as a young society matron in Malibu who launches
her literary career—and destroys her private life—by writing a tell-all
novel.
MRQE.com offers this synopsis: Two women find their friendship tested when one rises from obscurity to success in this glossy remake of Old Acquaintance.
Liz Hamilton (Jacqueline Bisset) and Merry Noel (Candice Bergen) are
close friends who met while they were freshmen at Smith College in the
1950s. Liz has become a highly respected novelist, while Merry wed Doug
Blake (David Selby) and raised a family. While Merry is happy, she can't
help but envy Liz for her glamorous career as an author. Merry decides
to write a novel of her own, and with Liz's help, the book soon finds a
publisher. While Merry's trashy potboiler earns few positive reviews,
it's a massive best-seller, and Merry's fame and wealth soon outstrips
that of Liz, leading to jealousy between the old friends and problems in
Merry's marriage. Rich and Famous was the final picture directed by
Hollywood legend George Cukor; the guest list at the party sequences
include such literary and cinematic notables as Christopher Isherwood,
Ray Bradbury, Paul Morrissey, and Roger Vadim
I wondered what Ebert thought of it. It contains scenes that make you want to squirm because of their
awkwardness and awfulness, and yet you don't want to look away and
you're not bored. The movie has the courage to go to extremes, and some
of those extremes may not be art but are certainly unforgettable.
The movie forges ahead through tempestuous fights and tearful
reconciliations, while Bergen's alcoholic ex-husband makes a pass at
Bisset, and Bergen tries to bribe all of New York to win the book prize.
I was not (and am not) sure what this movie was trying to tell me about
the two characters -- perhaps that if you stay in touch with someone
for twenty years, you can be absolutely sure that at the end of that
time you still will be in touch.
Insights into human nature don't seem to be the point of the movie,
anyway. It's a slick, trashy, entertaining melodrama, with too many dumb
scenes to qualify as successful. A film critic for one of the national
newsweeklies said, in reviewing this film, that he has a friend who has a
rule: He only attends movies that are in color and are about rich
people. I deplore the attitude behind that statement, but in a crazy
way, I absolutely understand it.
More than once, during shouting matches, I thought it would do well as a stage play.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops's review: Rich and Famous
-- Screen version of the John Van Druten play about two very different
women (Candice Bergen and Jacqueline Bisset), both writers, who preserve
a friendship for more than two decades despite the strains caused by
emulation and jealousy. Directed by George Cukor, the glossy soap opera
pays more attention to its glamorous locations than to the human
dimension of its story. The sole redeeming feature is good acting by the
principals. General air of vapid amorality and two graphic sexual
sequences. (O) (R)
(
1981
)
O: morally offensive
Vincent Canby's review in the Times: SOMEWHERE inside ''Rich and Famous,'' George Cukor's splashy, elongated
new comedy, there is the material for a possibly brilliant two-character
one-act play.
Showing posts with label Writers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writers. Show all posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Saturday, September 7, 2013
Finding Forrester (2000)
Fondly remembered, I went looking for it. Watched. Liked it; watched it twice. Ebert gave it three stars.
Ebert: The movie contains at least two insights into writing that are right on target. The first is William's advice to Jamal that he give up waiting for inspiration and just start writing. My own way of phrasing this rule is: The Muse visits during composition, not before. The other accurate insight is a subtle one. An early shot pans across the books next to Jamal's bed, and we see that his reading tastes are wide, good and various. All of the books are battered, except one, the paperback of James Joyce's Finnegans Wake, which looks brand new and has no creases on its spine. That's the book everyone buys but nobody reads.
Both Connery and Brown are superb in their acting.
Labels:
Academic,
Basketball,
Bronx,
New York,
Race relations,
Writers,
Writing
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
South from Granada
From Spanish director Fernando Colomo comes this adaptation of Gerald Brenan's comedic autobiographical book Al sur de Granada. Matthew Goode stars as Brenan, a young Englishman of affluent and noble stock. Motivated by idealism and with a desire to become a great writer, Gerald moves to a small Spanish town to get away from the trappings of his upbringing. There, he befriends Paco, a local man played by Guillermo Toledo, who helps introduce Gerald to the town. Eventually, the beautiful Juliana (Verónica Sánchez) catches Gerald's eye, and he immediately falls for her. From there, it's up to Paco to familiarize Gerald with the local customs so that he can win the heart of Juliana. Consuelo Trujillo and Ángela Molina also star.
Fairly good film. Enjoyable enough.
Brenan is friends with Lytton Strachey and others from the Bloomsbury group, including Dora Carrington, with whom he is portrayed as being in love. In Yegen,a village in the Spanish countryside below Granada, he settles down to clear his head so he can write. However, events and people conspire to otherwise occupy him. In the drama which includes inter-class sex and a Catholic priest who can not help but be in love with a local woman, Brenan falls in love with Julianna, a local woman whom some suspect of being a witch. She is young, and falls in love, eventually, with Brenan. She also tells him she wnats to bear his baby, and is not interested in marriage.
Fairly good film. Enjoyable enough.
Brenan is friends with Lytton Strachey and others from the Bloomsbury group, including Dora Carrington, with whom he is portrayed as being in love. In Yegen,a village in the Spanish countryside below Granada, he settles down to clear his head so he can write. However, events and people conspire to otherwise occupy him. In the drama which includes inter-class sex and a Catholic priest who can not help but be in love with a local woman, Brenan falls in love with Julianna, a local woman whom some suspect of being a witch. She is young, and falls in love, eventually, with Brenan. She also tells him she wnats to bear his baby, and is not interested in marriage.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
How It Went
Not too well, from the sounds of it. The first paragraph of the review is startling.
Kurt Vonnegut died in 2007, but one gets the sense from Charles J. Shields’s sad, often heartbreaking biography, “And So It Goes,” that he would have been happy to depart this vale of tears sooner. Indeed, he did try to flag down Charon the Ferryman and hitch a ride across the River Styx in 1984 (pills and booze), only to be yanked back to life and his marriage to the photographer Jill Krementz, which, in these dreary pages, reads like a version of hell on earth. But then Vonnegut’s relations with women were vexed from the start. When he was 21, his mother successfully committed suicide — on Mother’s Day.
Oops.
Vonnegut’s masterpiece was “Slaughterhouse-Five,” the novelistic account of being present at the destruction of Dresden by firebombing in 1945. Between that horror (his job as a P.O.W. was to stack and burn the corpses); the mother’s suicide; the early death of a beloved sister, the only woman he seems truly to have loved; serial unhappy marriages; and his resentment that the literary establishment really considered him (just) a writer of juvenile and jokey pulp fiction, Vonnegut certainly earned his status as Man of Sorrows, much as Mark Twain, to whom he is often compared, earned his.
Yikes.
Vonnegut and the other great “comic” (or if you prefer, ironic or tragico-comical-ironic) novelist of World War II, Joseph Heller, are getting their biographical due, almost simultaneously.There are some odd synergies. The two met years after their wars, onstage at a literary festival in 1968, and became great friends and eventually neighbors. Heller’s war was up in the air, as a bombardier in the nose cone of a B-25. Vonnegut’s was at ground level, as an infantryman in the Battle of the Bulge, and ultimately beneath ground level, in the basement of Schlachthof-Fünf during the firebombing. In a detail that struck me as, well, weird, Vonnegut’s breakthrough moment while he was trying to get a handle on how to write his novel came during a visit to a war buddy — in Hellertown, Pa. More ironic is that both World War II novels ended up being Vietnam novels.
Fascinating review. I read Vonnegut. And I saw him once, on the stoop of a townhouse on 48th Street (I think it was), around the corner from 3rd Avenue; he'd come outside, with a little white poodle, I think, smoking a cigarette, and sat on the stoop. He saw me recognize him, and shrugged.
Kurt Vonnegut died in 2007, but one gets the sense from Charles J. Shields’s sad, often heartbreaking biography, “And So It Goes,” that he would have been happy to depart this vale of tears sooner. Indeed, he did try to flag down Charon the Ferryman and hitch a ride across the River Styx in 1984 (pills and booze), only to be yanked back to life and his marriage to the photographer Jill Krementz, which, in these dreary pages, reads like a version of hell on earth. But then Vonnegut’s relations with women were vexed from the start. When he was 21, his mother successfully committed suicide — on Mother’s Day.
Oops.
Vonnegut’s masterpiece was “Slaughterhouse-Five,” the novelistic account of being present at the destruction of Dresden by firebombing in 1945. Between that horror (his job as a P.O.W. was to stack and burn the corpses); the mother’s suicide; the early death of a beloved sister, the only woman he seems truly to have loved; serial unhappy marriages; and his resentment that the literary establishment really considered him (just) a writer of juvenile and jokey pulp fiction, Vonnegut certainly earned his status as Man of Sorrows, much as Mark Twain, to whom he is often compared, earned his.
Yikes.
Vonnegut and the other great “comic” (or if you prefer, ironic or tragico-comical-ironic) novelist of World War II, Joseph Heller, are getting their biographical due, almost simultaneously.There are some odd synergies. The two met years after their wars, onstage at a literary festival in 1968, and became great friends and eventually neighbors. Heller’s war was up in the air, as a bombardier in the nose cone of a B-25. Vonnegut’s was at ground level, as an infantryman in the Battle of the Bulge, and ultimately beneath ground level, in the basement of Schlachthof-Fünf during the firebombing. In a detail that struck me as, well, weird, Vonnegut’s breakthrough moment while he was trying to get a handle on how to write his novel came during a visit to a war buddy — in Hellertown, Pa. More ironic is that both World War II novels ended up being Vietnam novels.
Fascinating review. I read Vonnegut. And I saw him once, on the stoop of a townhouse on 48th Street (I think it was), around the corner from 3rd Avenue; he'd come outside, with a little white poodle, I think, smoking a cigarette, and sat on the stoop. He saw me recognize him, and shrugged.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Nobel a platform for outspoken Vargas Llosa
The Nobel Prize in literature brings a long-awaited accolade to Peruvian author Mario Vargas Llosa, and also a new platform for him to assail leftist leaders Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Fidel Castro of Cuba.
Fidel is an anachronism, as he himself recognizes.
Vargas Llosa has regularly directed barbs at Chavez, denouncing him as autocratic. When the novelist visited Venezuela last year to attend a pro-democracy forum, he was stopped by authorities at the airport for nearly two hours. He said he was questioned and told that as a foreigner he didn't "have the right to make political statements" in Venezuela.
What a bunch of mierda. People who are afraid of words are cowards, and will, in the long run, lose.
Chavez disputed that account at the time, saying his critics were putting on a show to discredit his government. Chavez invited Vargas Llosa and other intellectuals to debate on live television, then backed away from a direct debate after critics suggested a one-on-one contest with Vargas Llosa — with equal time for each.
Chávez would look a fool debating Llosa one-on-one. In a gaggle, he could let pandemonium and disorder be his allies, as he usually does.
He burst onto the literary scene in the early 1960s with the novel "The Time of the Hero" (the Spanish title was "La Ciudad y los Perros") — a book that drew on his experiences at a Peruvian military academy and angered the country's military. One thousand copies of the novel were burned by military authorities, with some generals calling the book false and Vargas Llosa a communist.
How ironic. Then again, irony is the stuff of life.
Fidel is an anachronism, as he himself recognizes.
Vargas Llosa has regularly directed barbs at Chavez, denouncing him as autocratic. When the novelist visited Venezuela last year to attend a pro-democracy forum, he was stopped by authorities at the airport for nearly two hours. He said he was questioned and told that as a foreigner he didn't "have the right to make political statements" in Venezuela.
What a bunch of mierda. People who are afraid of words are cowards, and will, in the long run, lose.
Chavez disputed that account at the time, saying his critics were putting on a show to discredit his government. Chavez invited Vargas Llosa and other intellectuals to debate on live television, then backed away from a direct debate after critics suggested a one-on-one contest with Vargas Llosa — with equal time for each.
Chávez would look a fool debating Llosa one-on-one. In a gaggle, he could let pandemonium and disorder be his allies, as he usually does.
He burst onto the literary scene in the early 1960s with the novel "The Time of the Hero" (the Spanish title was "La Ciudad y los Perros") — a book that drew on his experiences at a Peruvian military academy and angered the country's military. One thousand copies of the novel were burned by military authorities, with some generals calling the book false and Vargas Llosa a communist.
How ironic. Then again, irony is the stuff of life.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Vargas Llosa Is Awarded Nobel Prize in Literature
The Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa, whose deeply political work vividly examines the perils of power and corruption in Latin America, won the 2010 Nobel Prize in Literature on Thursday. Announcing the award in Stockholm, the Swedish Academy praised Mr. Vargas Llosa “for his cartography of the structures of power and his trenchant images of the individual’s resistance, revolt and defeat.”
In an interview with The Times in 2002, Mr. Vargas Llosa said that it was the novelist’s obligation to question real life. “I don’t think there is a great fiction that is not an essential contradiction of the world as it is,” he said. “The Inquisition forbade the novel for 300 years in Latin America. I think they understood very well the seditious consequence that fiction can have on the human spirit.’”
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Why this world?
I f irst became aware of Lispector in reading Gregory Rabassa's If this be treason : translation and its discontents : a memoir. Seeing this book, I thought it'd be interesting. Sort of, as it turned out, but not enough to excite me and get me to read it. Perhaps another time.
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Read More Than Respected
The Secret Lives of Somerset Maugham
by Selina Hastings
Random House, 626 pages, $35
Over the course of a literary career that spanned an astonishing eight decades, Somerset Maugham (1874-1965) wrote some of the 20th century's best-loved novels (e.g., "Of Human Bondage"), a cluster of hit plays in London's West End ("The Constant Wife"), ground-breaking travel books ("The Gentleman in the Parlour," about Southeast Asia), an eloquent intellectual memoir ("The Summing Up"), and some of the finest short stories in the English language ("The Letter," "Rain," "The Outstation"). Such was his success as a writer that, in his later years, he became almost as well known for his opulent manner of living as for his work.
The book is given a generally positive review.
In "The Secret Lives of Somerset Maugham," Ms. Hastings draws on thorough research and recently released documents to trace Maugham's busy life—his stormy marriage, his attentiveness to his daughter, Liza, his world-wide travels, his literary quarrels, his generosity to younger writers, his often furtive homosexuality—but she also pays a great deal of attention to his literary output, where the emphasis belongs. It irked Maugham, she says, that Bloomsbury and other highbrow literary circles tended to dismiss him or ignore him altogether.
"As much as his middlebrow reputation," Ms. Hastings writes, "it was his success, and the affluence that came with that success, that in the eyes of Bloomsbury placed him beyond the pale." Maugham himself characterized his position on more than one occasion: "I know just where I stand, in the very front row of the second rate." Ms. Hastings ranks Maugham rather higher than that.
by Selina Hastings
Random House, 626 pages, $35
Over the course of a literary career that spanned an astonishing eight decades, Somerset Maugham (1874-1965) wrote some of the 20th century's best-loved novels (e.g., "Of Human Bondage"), a cluster of hit plays in London's West End ("The Constant Wife"), ground-breaking travel books ("The Gentleman in the Parlour," about Southeast Asia), an eloquent intellectual memoir ("The Summing Up"), and some of the finest short stories in the English language ("The Letter," "Rain," "The Outstation"). Such was his success as a writer that, in his later years, he became almost as well known for his opulent manner of living as for his work.
The book is given a generally positive review.
In "The Secret Lives of Somerset Maugham," Ms. Hastings draws on thorough research and recently released documents to trace Maugham's busy life—his stormy marriage, his attentiveness to his daughter, Liza, his world-wide travels, his literary quarrels, his generosity to younger writers, his often furtive homosexuality—but she also pays a great deal of attention to his literary output, where the emphasis belongs. It irked Maugham, she says, that Bloomsbury and other highbrow literary circles tended to dismiss him or ignore him altogether.
"As much as his middlebrow reputation," Ms. Hastings writes, "it was his success, and the affluence that came with that success, that in the eyes of Bloomsbury placed him beyond the pale." Maugham himself characterized his position on more than one occasion: "I know just where I stand, in the very front row of the second rate." Ms. Hastings ranks Maugham rather higher than that.
Friday, April 30, 2010
Escriben para niños
A story in El Universal's website about Mario Vargas Llosa and Spanish writer Arturo Pérez-Reverte.
Pérez-Reverte y Vargas Llosa escriben para niños
Notimex - El Universal - MADRID
Jueves 29 de abril de 2010
Los autores presentaron una nueva colecci�n dedicada a los peque�os
Los escritores Arturo Pérez -Reverte y Mario Vargas Llosa presentaron hoy la nueva colección de �lbumes ilustrados con historias originales para los ni�os, escritas por grandes nombres de la literatura de adultos.
En el emblemático C�rculo de Bellas Artes, los dos escritores, espa�ol y peruano, presentaron las primeras obras de la colecci�n: 'El peque�o Hoplita', escrita por P�rez-Reverte; y 'Fonchito y la luna', por Vargas Llosa.
'Siempre me han molestado los libros infantiles escritos como si los ni�os fueran bobos. Los ni�os son los lectores m�s crueles y son mucho m�s honrados que los adultos', se�al� P�rez-Reverte.
Para Vargas Llosa, escribir una literatura infantil requiere tanto rigor como escribir poes�a.
'Un libro infantil bien construido puede marcar mucho a un ni�o, al grado de que puede ser el motivo de que siga leyendo o deje de hacerlo', asegur�.
'Requiere rigor para los escritores intentar llegar con sus historias a esas mentes frescas que no tienen las complicaciones de los lectores adultos y por lo tanto, s�lo se les puede seducir o aburrir', indic� el peruano.
Con el t�tulo de 'Mi primer', la editorial Alfaguara lanz� este jueves al mercado esta colecci�n con unos cuentos de formato grande e ilustraciones para incentivar la pasi�n de los ni�os por la literatura.
Vargas Llosa reconoci� que siempre quiso escribir un libro para ni�os, pero el g�nero le resultaba 'demasiado ajeno y enormemente dif�cil'.
'Es un g�nero dif�cil, exige rigor y esfuerzo. Hay que contar una historia desde la perspectiva, desde la sensibilidad de un ni�o', sostuvo. Confi� en que la nueva colecci�n tenga �xito y que de verdad llegue a los ni�os.
Por su parte, P�rez-Reverte, quien funge como asesor de la colecci�n, resalt� que los libros infantiles dejan un 'espacio en blanco' para que los ni�os puedan proyectar su imaginaci�n y crear un 'lector activo'.
'A pesar de todo lo que est� cambiando el mundo, la literatura sigue siendo el medio para mover la imaginaci�n de los m�s peque�os', insisti�.
Ambos coincidieron que el libro que les marc� en la infancia fue 'Los tres mosqueteros', de Alejandro Dumas, e incluso P�rez-Reverte confes� que 'yo llor� cuando muri� Portos'.
�
cvtp
Pérez-Reverte y Vargas Llosa escriben para niños
Notimex - El Universal - MADRID
Jueves 29 de abril de 2010
Los autores presentaron una nueva colecci�n dedicada a los peque�os
Los escritores Arturo Pérez -Reverte y Mario Vargas Llosa presentaron hoy la nueva colección de �lbumes ilustrados con historias originales para los ni�os, escritas por grandes nombres de la literatura de adultos.
En el emblemático C�rculo de Bellas Artes, los dos escritores, espa�ol y peruano, presentaron las primeras obras de la colecci�n: 'El peque�o Hoplita', escrita por P�rez-Reverte; y 'Fonchito y la luna', por Vargas Llosa.
'Siempre me han molestado los libros infantiles escritos como si los ni�os fueran bobos. Los ni�os son los lectores m�s crueles y son mucho m�s honrados que los adultos', se�al� P�rez-Reverte.
Para Vargas Llosa, escribir una literatura infantil requiere tanto rigor como escribir poes�a.
'Un libro infantil bien construido puede marcar mucho a un ni�o, al grado de que puede ser el motivo de que siga leyendo o deje de hacerlo', asegur�.
'Requiere rigor para los escritores intentar llegar con sus historias a esas mentes frescas que no tienen las complicaciones de los lectores adultos y por lo tanto, s�lo se les puede seducir o aburrir', indic� el peruano.
Con el t�tulo de 'Mi primer', la editorial Alfaguara lanz� este jueves al mercado esta colecci�n con unos cuentos de formato grande e ilustraciones para incentivar la pasi�n de los ni�os por la literatura.
Vargas Llosa reconoci� que siempre quiso escribir un libro para ni�os, pero el g�nero le resultaba 'demasiado ajeno y enormemente dif�cil'.
'Es un g�nero dif�cil, exige rigor y esfuerzo. Hay que contar una historia desde la perspectiva, desde la sensibilidad de un ni�o', sostuvo. Confi� en que la nueva colecci�n tenga �xito y que de verdad llegue a los ni�os.
Por su parte, P�rez-Reverte, quien funge como asesor de la colecci�n, resalt� que los libros infantiles dejan un 'espacio en blanco' para que los ni�os puedan proyectar su imaginaci�n y crear un 'lector activo'.
'A pesar de todo lo que est� cambiando el mundo, la literatura sigue siendo el medio para mover la imaginaci�n de los m�s peque�os', insisti�.
Ambos coincidieron que el libro que les marc� en la infancia fue 'Los tres mosqueteros', de Alejandro Dumas, e incluso P�rez-Reverte confes� que 'yo llor� cuando muri� Portos'.
�
cvtp
Thursday, March 18, 2010
A week in December
Faulks's hugely ambitious novel is a delightful and witty satire on contemporary London life, says Justin Cartwright
Faulks's new novel is a study of contemporary London. Photograph: Sophia Evans
Sebastian Faulks's new novel, set in one week in December 2007, is very ambitious. It aspires to be a state-of-the-nation book, a satirical comedy of metropolitan literary life, a sweeping, Dickensian look at contemporary London, a serious examination of Islam and the reasons for radicalism among young Muslims, a thriller, a satire on the Notting Hill Cameroonians and a detailed look at the sharp financial practices that led to the collapse. There's London football, reality TV, cyber porn, a love story or two. As if all that weren't enough, it is a roman a clef, which has already provided fun for metropolitan journalists as they speculate about the identity of the various characters.
A Week in December. Sebastian Faulks
pp400,Hutchinson,£18.99

The scene is set with the wife of a Tory MP organising a dinner party for the benefit of her husband's career in somewhere evoking Notting Hill. Every guest is chosen to suggest that the MP is a Renaissance man. We are reminded of Alan Hollinghurst's The Line of Beauty, as though all wealthy Tories inevitably have grand gatherings with deep undercurrents of class, ambition and financial chicanery. As she goes through the guest list, we immediately know that they are all going to be linked in some way. The guests are mostly wealthy men and their wives, owners of hedge funds and banks and so on.
There is also a manufacturer who has been invited to lend multicultural credibility. Farooq al-Rashid has made his money in pickles; he is a substantial contributor to the party and he has a son – the alarm bells ring stridently at this point – called Hassan who, in his parents' opinion, is rather too interested in the true message of Islam. While they simply want to enjoy the benefits of wealth and acceptance, he is planning to blow the Kafir world to pieces.
John Veals is a hedge fund owner who has made hundreds of millions by barely legal activity and he sees an opportunity to make much, much more by causing a big bank to collapse. Faulks has clearly done extensive research, sometimes not wholly digested by the plot, but admirably authentic. The real problem with Veals, though, is that he never lifts off the page. This is partly because the book is so crowded that Faulks doesn't have the space to produce a rounded character. Any novel that tries to take the temperature of the nation needs a fully human central character to pull the big themes together. Dickens's Merdle and Tom Wolfe's Sherman McCoy are horribly believable.
Anyway, besides the toffs, there are two less plutocratic guests invited to the dinner party, one an unsuccessful and bookish young barrister, Gabriel Northwood, the other a jobbing literary journalist, R Tranter. Tranter is all too clearly based on journalist DJ Taylor. Tranter admires Thackeray and writes for a satirical magazine, the Toad; Taylor has written a biography of Thackeray and writes a literary column for Private Eye. Tranter uses the Toad to work out his disdain for, and envy of, more successful writers. He also has a habit in his reviews of sadly concluding that most successful authors are ultimately deploying a few cheap tricks and are con artists, even if they are good. His reaction when he reads a novel by a rival critic – "It was worse, far worse, than he had dared to hope" – is spot on. There is a brilliant literary prize scene which was painfully familiar to me. Faulks knows the book world and satirises it with brio, but he can give up any hope of winning the Costa Prize after this.
The marriage of these elements is mostly smooth, with the best strands involving the literary world and the hypocrisies and presumption of the rich. Less successful is Faulks's rather plodding analysis of why young men turn to Islam. All too often, we are subjected to reiterations of the contradictions of the Qur'an and Islam's appeal to the disaffected, which are strangely lifeless as fiction. In John Updike's 2006 novel , the conversations between the potential bomber and his mentor also suffered from a certain stiffness. Maybe it is difficult to cross this particular cultural barrier. Another key character, Jenni Fortune (not invited to the dinner party), is a book-loving, cyber-obsessed young tube driver; her world isn't fully realised either.
But Gabriel Northwood, the barrister, is a fine character. He is slightly diffident, very human in his weaknesses, observant and well read. Remembering the great love of his life, a married woman, Northwood wonders about "this desperate passion… was it really such an enviable way to live, always at the edge of panic, desperate for a cellphone bleep, all your judgments skewed?" Some time before the book opens, he met Jenni, when he was junior to a QC on a case involving London Transport: Jenni had been driving a train when somebody jumped on to the line. He has taken to seeing her on the slightest pretext; we know that they are going to fall in love, despite their different backgrounds.
As the week progresses, we see Farooq al-Rashid preparing for his investiture with the OBE at Buckingham Palace; he is fretting over what he is going to say to the Queen. For a few months, he has been employing Tranter to coach him on the Queen's literary preferences. At their first meeting, Tranter dismissed all the books Rashid had been advised to buy ("OT – Oirish Twaddle", the "higher bogus", "poor man's Somerset Maugham" or "from the man who put the anal into banal") and recommended instead an obscure Victorian writer and Dick Francis.
In a highly nervous state, Rashid is trying to memorise the verdicts Tranter delivered in case Her Majesty should ask him what he reads. Meanwhile, young Hassan has to juggle his timetable in order to go on from Buckingham Palace to the bombing of a hospital with a large maternity unit. The scene at the investiture is hilarious, particularly as Prince Charles stands in for his mother. One of the flunkeys, as he boxes up Farooq's medal, says: "How was the Princess? She's ever such a chatterbox when she gets going. There you are, sir. One little gong."
As John Veals puts the finishing touches to his plan to bring down a bank – and incidentally destroy the livelihoods of thousands of African farmers – his teenage son, Finbar, is experimenting with skunk. This leads to a terrible psychotic episode and admission to hospital where it is touch and go if he will recover or lapse into schizophrenia. His mother, Vanessa, ultimately comes to his aid, overcome by guilt for her neglect.
Finally, the dinner party takes place. One of the guests, Roger Malpasse, delivers a fine drunken rant against the financial malpractice that is leading to crisis: "It's a fraud as old as markets themselves. The only difference is that it's been done on a titanic scale. At the invitation of the politicians. Behind the backs of the regulators and with the dumb connivance of the auditors. And with the fatal misunderstanding of the ratings agencies." This is one of the strongest moments in the novel, and unexpected, because up to now Roger has been portrayed only as a man who likes a drink, starting with a "phlegm-cracker" early in the day, moving on to a "sharpener" before food and finishing with a "zonker", which is virtually anything he can tip into a glass at the end of the day.
A Week in December is a little too long, a little too prolix. And yet it survives all this to be a compelling tale of contemporary London. I am not sure that it is the classic state-of-the-nation novel we need, but I have no doubt at all that it will outsell the higher bogus by a very long way.
Sebastian Faulks
Born 20 April 1953 and later educated at Emmanuel College, Cambridge. Now lives with his wife, Victoria, and three children in west London.
1984 His first published novel, A Trick of the Light
1986 Appointed the first literary editor of the Independent, then deputy editor of the Independent on Sunday
1989 The Girl at the Lion d'Or, the first of his French Trilogy, is published.
1993 Birdsong published.
1998 Charlotte Gray wins the James Tait Black Memorial Prize and is made into a film starring Cate Blanchett.
2006 Publishes the non-fiction Pistache, a series of parodies of other writers.
2008 Writes Devil May Care, a new James Bond novel to mark the centenary of Ian Fleming's birth.
2002 Made a CBE and in 2007 an honorary fellow of Emmanuel College.
He says: "I found it extremely difficult to get going as a novelist."
They say: "A masterpiece, one of the great novels of this or any other century." Trevor Nunn on Human Traces (2005). Oliver Marre
Faulks's new novel is a study of contemporary London. Photograph: Sophia Evans
Sebastian Faulks's new novel, set in one week in December 2007, is very ambitious. It aspires to be a state-of-the-nation book, a satirical comedy of metropolitan literary life, a sweeping, Dickensian look at contemporary London, a serious examination of Islam and the reasons for radicalism among young Muslims, a thriller, a satire on the Notting Hill Cameroonians and a detailed look at the sharp financial practices that led to the collapse. There's London football, reality TV, cyber porn, a love story or two. As if all that weren't enough, it is a roman a clef, which has already provided fun for metropolitan journalists as they speculate about the identity of the various characters.
A Week in December. Sebastian Faulks
pp400,Hutchinson,£18.99

The scene is set with the wife of a Tory MP organising a dinner party for the benefit of her husband's career in somewhere evoking Notting Hill. Every guest is chosen to suggest that the MP is a Renaissance man. We are reminded of Alan Hollinghurst's The Line of Beauty, as though all wealthy Tories inevitably have grand gatherings with deep undercurrents of class, ambition and financial chicanery. As she goes through the guest list, we immediately know that they are all going to be linked in some way. The guests are mostly wealthy men and their wives, owners of hedge funds and banks and so on.
There is also a manufacturer who has been invited to lend multicultural credibility. Farooq al-Rashid has made his money in pickles; he is a substantial contributor to the party and he has a son – the alarm bells ring stridently at this point – called Hassan who, in his parents' opinion, is rather too interested in the true message of Islam. While they simply want to enjoy the benefits of wealth and acceptance, he is planning to blow the Kafir world to pieces.
John Veals is a hedge fund owner who has made hundreds of millions by barely legal activity and he sees an opportunity to make much, much more by causing a big bank to collapse. Faulks has clearly done extensive research, sometimes not wholly digested by the plot, but admirably authentic. The real problem with Veals, though, is that he never lifts off the page. This is partly because the book is so crowded that Faulks doesn't have the space to produce a rounded character. Any novel that tries to take the temperature of the nation needs a fully human central character to pull the big themes together. Dickens's Merdle and Tom Wolfe's Sherman McCoy are horribly believable.
Anyway, besides the toffs, there are two less plutocratic guests invited to the dinner party, one an unsuccessful and bookish young barrister, Gabriel Northwood, the other a jobbing literary journalist, R Tranter. Tranter is all too clearly based on journalist DJ Taylor. Tranter admires Thackeray and writes for a satirical magazine, the Toad; Taylor has written a biography of Thackeray and writes a literary column for Private Eye. Tranter uses the Toad to work out his disdain for, and envy of, more successful writers. He also has a habit in his reviews of sadly concluding that most successful authors are ultimately deploying a few cheap tricks and are con artists, even if they are good. His reaction when he reads a novel by a rival critic – "It was worse, far worse, than he had dared to hope" – is spot on. There is a brilliant literary prize scene which was painfully familiar to me. Faulks knows the book world and satirises it with brio, but he can give up any hope of winning the Costa Prize after this.
The marriage of these elements is mostly smooth, with the best strands involving the literary world and the hypocrisies and presumption of the rich. Less successful is Faulks's rather plodding analysis of why young men turn to Islam. All too often, we are subjected to reiterations of the contradictions of the Qur'an and Islam's appeal to the disaffected, which are strangely lifeless as fiction. In John Updike's 2006 novel , the conversations between the potential bomber and his mentor also suffered from a certain stiffness. Maybe it is difficult to cross this particular cultural barrier. Another key character, Jenni Fortune (not invited to the dinner party), is a book-loving, cyber-obsessed young tube driver; her world isn't fully realised either.
But Gabriel Northwood, the barrister, is a fine character. He is slightly diffident, very human in his weaknesses, observant and well read. Remembering the great love of his life, a married woman, Northwood wonders about "this desperate passion… was it really such an enviable way to live, always at the edge of panic, desperate for a cellphone bleep, all your judgments skewed?" Some time before the book opens, he met Jenni, when he was junior to a QC on a case involving London Transport: Jenni had been driving a train when somebody jumped on to the line. He has taken to seeing her on the slightest pretext; we know that they are going to fall in love, despite their different backgrounds.
As the week progresses, we see Farooq al-Rashid preparing for his investiture with the OBE at Buckingham Palace; he is fretting over what he is going to say to the Queen. For a few months, he has been employing Tranter to coach him on the Queen's literary preferences. At their first meeting, Tranter dismissed all the books Rashid had been advised to buy ("OT – Oirish Twaddle", the "higher bogus", "poor man's Somerset Maugham" or "from the man who put the anal into banal") and recommended instead an obscure Victorian writer and Dick Francis.
In a highly nervous state, Rashid is trying to memorise the verdicts Tranter delivered in case Her Majesty should ask him what he reads. Meanwhile, young Hassan has to juggle his timetable in order to go on from Buckingham Palace to the bombing of a hospital with a large maternity unit. The scene at the investiture is hilarious, particularly as Prince Charles stands in for his mother. One of the flunkeys, as he boxes up Farooq's medal, says: "How was the Princess? She's ever such a chatterbox when she gets going. There you are, sir. One little gong."
As John Veals puts the finishing touches to his plan to bring down a bank – and incidentally destroy the livelihoods of thousands of African farmers – his teenage son, Finbar, is experimenting with skunk. This leads to a terrible psychotic episode and admission to hospital where it is touch and go if he will recover or lapse into schizophrenia. His mother, Vanessa, ultimately comes to his aid, overcome by guilt for her neglect.
Finally, the dinner party takes place. One of the guests, Roger Malpasse, delivers a fine drunken rant against the financial malpractice that is leading to crisis: "It's a fraud as old as markets themselves. The only difference is that it's been done on a titanic scale. At the invitation of the politicians. Behind the backs of the regulators and with the dumb connivance of the auditors. And with the fatal misunderstanding of the ratings agencies." This is one of the strongest moments in the novel, and unexpected, because up to now Roger has been portrayed only as a man who likes a drink, starting with a "phlegm-cracker" early in the day, moving on to a "sharpener" before food and finishing with a "zonker", which is virtually anything he can tip into a glass at the end of the day.
A Week in December is a little too long, a little too prolix. And yet it survives all this to be a compelling tale of contemporary London. I am not sure that it is the classic state-of-the-nation novel we need, but I have no doubt at all that it will outsell the higher bogus by a very long way.
Sebastian Faulks
Born 20 April 1953 and later educated at Emmanuel College, Cambridge. Now lives with his wife, Victoria, and three children in west London.
1984 His first published novel, A Trick of the Light
1986 Appointed the first literary editor of the Independent, then deputy editor of the Independent on Sunday
1989 The Girl at the Lion d'Or, the first of his French Trilogy, is published.
1993 Birdsong published.
1998 Charlotte Gray wins the James Tait Black Memorial Prize and is made into a film starring Cate Blanchett.
2006 Publishes the non-fiction Pistache, a series of parodies of other writers.
2008 Writes Devil May Care, a new James Bond novel to mark the centenary of Ian Fleming's birth.
2002 Made a CBE and in 2007 an honorary fellow of Emmanuel College.
He says: "I found it extremely difficult to get going as a novelist."
They say: "A masterpiece, one of the great novels of this or any other century." Trevor Nunn on Human Traces (2005). Oliver Marre
Monday, February 22, 2010
Faulkner Link to Plantation Diary Discovered
Southern Historical Collection/Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Francis Terry Leak’s diary was read by Faulkner. A page from 1856 records a slave sale.
February 11, 2010
Faulkner Link to Plantation Diary Discovered
By PATRICIA COHEN
The climactic moment in William Faulkner’s 1942 novel “Go Down, Moses” comes when Isaac McCaslin finally decides to open his grandfather’s leather farm ledgers with their “scarred and cracked backs” and “yellowed pages scrawled in fading ink” — proof of his family’s slave-owning past. Now, what appears to be the document on which Faulkner modeled that ledger as well as the source for myriad names, incidents and details that populate his fictionalized Yoknapatawpha County has been discovered.
The original manuscript, a diary from the mid-1800s, was written by Francis Terry Leak, a wealthy plantation owner in Mississippi whose great-grandson Edgar Wiggin Francisco Jr. was a friend of Faulkner’s since childhood. Mr. Francisco’s son, Edgar Wiggin Francisco III, now 79, recalls the writer’s frequent visits to the family homestead in Holly Springs, Miss., throughout the 1930s, saying Faulkner was fascinated with the diary’s several volumes. Mr. Francisco said he saw them in Faulker’s hands and remembers that he “was always taking copious notes.”
Specialists have been stunned and intrigued not only by this peephole into Faulkner’s working process, but also by material that may have inspired this Nobel-prize-winning author, considered by many to be one of the greatest American novelists of the 20th century.
“I think it’s one of the most sensational literary discoveries of recent decades,” said John Lowe, an English professor at Louisiana State University who is writing a book on Faulkner. He was one of a handful of experts who met Dr. Francisco at the hand-hewn log house in Holly Springs last month. There they saw the windowpane where a cousin, Ludie Baugh, etched the letters L-U-D-I-E into the glass while watching Confederate soldiers march by — a scene that appears in several Faulkner works.
During the gathering Dr. Francisco, known in childhood as Little Eddie, described how Faulkner stood in front of that window and said, “ ‘She’s still here,’ like she was a ghost,” Professor Lowe recalled.
Dr. Francisco, speaking by telephone from his home in Atlanta, remembered hearing Faulkner rant as he read Leak’s pro-slavery and pro-Confederacy views: “Faulkner became very angry. He would curse the man and take notes and curse the man and take more notes.”
Sally Wolff-King, a scholar of Southern literature at Emory University who uncovered the connection between the author and the journal, called it “a once-in-a-lifetime literary find.”
“The diary and a number of family stories seem to have provided the philosophical and thematic power for some of his major works,” she added.
Names of slaves owned by Leak — Caruthers, Moses, Isaac, Sam, Toney, Mollie, Edmund and Worsham — all appear in some form in “Go Down, Moses.” Other recorded names, like Candis (Candace in the book) and Ben, show up in “The Sound and The Fury” (1929) while Old Rose, Henry, Ellen and Milly are characters in “Absalom, Absalom!” (1936). Charles Bonner, a well-known Civil War physician mentioned in the diary, would also seem to be the namesake of Charles Bon in “Absalom.”
Scholars found Faulkner’s decision to give his white characters the names of slaves particularly arresting. Professor Wolff-King said she believes he was “trying to recreate the slaves lives and give them a voice.”
Dr. Francisco says he is still very uncomfortable that his family’s connection to Faulkner has come to light. “I wouldn’t have done it at all,” he said about publicizing the diary. “My wife urged me until I finally did it,” he said of Anne Salyerds Francisco, his wife of 50 years. “She pushed and Sally pulled.”
“There were long-repressed things that Faulkner uncovered that I didn’t know were in the family,” Dr. Francisco explained, adding that his father never talked about Leak and his slave-owning past. “I just bottled all that up and forgot about it.”
Dr. Francisco said that neither he nor his father ever read much of Faulkner’s work, including “Go Down, Moses.”
“I tried to read that book years ago,” he said, “but I got so angry I threw it across the room, and it stayed there for months.” He said he now might give it another go.
The mothers of Faulkner and of Dr. Francisco’s father were close. The boys went to each other’s childhood birthday parties. Later they double dated and became hunting and drinking buddies, remaining friends until their 40s, when they drifted apart, a situation probably encouraged by Mr. Francisco’s wife, who did not approve of Faulkner’s drinking, smoking and cursing.
Professor Wolff-King had been working on a book about people who knew Faulkner and ended up connecting with Dr. Francisco because he was an alumnus of Emory. When she visited his home in Atlanta, his wife suggested he show the professor a typescript copy of the ledger. Included was a facsimile of a page that listed dollar amounts paid for individual slaves.
“At that moment I realized this diary may not only have influenced the ledger and slave sale record in ‘Go Down, Moses’ but also likely served an important source for much of William Faulkner’s work,” said Professor Wolff-King, who has spent 30 years studying the writer.
A short preview of her findings is in the fall 2009 issue of The Southern Literary Journal; her book “Ledgers of History: William Faulkner, an Almost Forgotten Friendship, and an Antebellum Diary,” is due out in June from Louisiana State University Press.
Professor Lowe reviewed the manuscript before publication. To protect against leaks the editor arranged a meeting in a coffee shop. “He gave me the manuscript in a plain brown wrapper, and I was sworn to secrecy,” he said.
“I was electrified when I was reading it,” he said. “Faulkner had a very intense and intellectual relationship with Dr. Francisco’s father,” which seems to have formed “the basis of some of the conversations you find in ‘Absalom, Absalom!’ and ‘Go Down, Moses.’ ”
The Leak papers are not unfamiliar to scholars. The family donated the journal, which includes the plantation accounts as well as descriptive sections, to the University of North Carolina in 1946 and received a typescript copy of the material that runs 1,800 pages. The original documents have been used by Southern economists and social historians for their insights into Mississippi’s plantation life, but no one has previously been aware that Faulkner, who died in 1962, had any connection to them.
Professor Wolff-King argues that elements and terms from the diary repeatedly surface in Faulkner’s work, including the ticking sound of a watch that Quentin Compson is obsessed with in “The Sound and the Fury”; descriptions of building a plantation match Thomas Sutpen’s in “Absalom, Absalom!”
Noel Polk, the editor of The Mississippi Quarterly and among the deans of Faulkner scholars, said, “I was surprised at the discovery of what is so clearly a major piece of information about his life, and maybe his work.”
He and others said it was still too early for them to gauge just how significant the diary is without reading Professor Wolff-King’s book and examining the ledgers themselves, especially when it comes to the more common details about the antebellum and Civil War eras.
“Almost every document that you can come up with that Faulkner used is interesting, but the question is what do you do with it,” Judith L. Sensibar, whose biography “Faulkner and Love: The Women Who Shaped His Art” was published last year. What does it tell us, for instance, about his “obsession with the ways in which slavery has disfigured the lives of both the slaves and their masters?” she asked.
Although literary experts have been taken aback by this unexpected find, Faulkner more than anyone would have understood how the past can unpredictably poke its nose into the present.
February 11, 2010
Faulkner Link to Plantation Diary Discovered
By PATRICIA COHEN
The climactic moment in William Faulkner’s 1942 novel “Go Down, Moses” comes when Isaac McCaslin finally decides to open his grandfather’s leather farm ledgers with their “scarred and cracked backs” and “yellowed pages scrawled in fading ink” — proof of his family’s slave-owning past. Now, what appears to be the document on which Faulkner modeled that ledger as well as the source for myriad names, incidents and details that populate his fictionalized Yoknapatawpha County has been discovered.
The original manuscript, a diary from the mid-1800s, was written by Francis Terry Leak, a wealthy plantation owner in Mississippi whose great-grandson Edgar Wiggin Francisco Jr. was a friend of Faulkner’s since childhood. Mr. Francisco’s son, Edgar Wiggin Francisco III, now 79, recalls the writer’s frequent visits to the family homestead in Holly Springs, Miss., throughout the 1930s, saying Faulkner was fascinated with the diary’s several volumes. Mr. Francisco said he saw them in Faulker’s hands and remembers that he “was always taking copious notes.”
Specialists have been stunned and intrigued not only by this peephole into Faulkner’s working process, but also by material that may have inspired this Nobel-prize-winning author, considered by many to be one of the greatest American novelists of the 20th century.
“I think it’s one of the most sensational literary discoveries of recent decades,” said John Lowe, an English professor at Louisiana State University who is writing a book on Faulkner. He was one of a handful of experts who met Dr. Francisco at the hand-hewn log house in Holly Springs last month. There they saw the windowpane where a cousin, Ludie Baugh, etched the letters L-U-D-I-E into the glass while watching Confederate soldiers march by — a scene that appears in several Faulkner works.
During the gathering Dr. Francisco, known in childhood as Little Eddie, described how Faulkner stood in front of that window and said, “ ‘She’s still here,’ like she was a ghost,” Professor Lowe recalled.
Dr. Francisco, speaking by telephone from his home in Atlanta, remembered hearing Faulkner rant as he read Leak’s pro-slavery and pro-Confederacy views: “Faulkner became very angry. He would curse the man and take notes and curse the man and take more notes.”
Sally Wolff-King, a scholar of Southern literature at Emory University who uncovered the connection between the author and the journal, called it “a once-in-a-lifetime literary find.”
“The diary and a number of family stories seem to have provided the philosophical and thematic power for some of his major works,” she added.
Names of slaves owned by Leak — Caruthers, Moses, Isaac, Sam, Toney, Mollie, Edmund and Worsham — all appear in some form in “Go Down, Moses.” Other recorded names, like Candis (Candace in the book) and Ben, show up in “The Sound and The Fury” (1929) while Old Rose, Henry, Ellen and Milly are characters in “Absalom, Absalom!” (1936). Charles Bonner, a well-known Civil War physician mentioned in the diary, would also seem to be the namesake of Charles Bon in “Absalom.”
Scholars found Faulkner’s decision to give his white characters the names of slaves particularly arresting. Professor Wolff-King said she believes he was “trying to recreate the slaves lives and give them a voice.”
Dr. Francisco says he is still very uncomfortable that his family’s connection to Faulkner has come to light. “I wouldn’t have done it at all,” he said about publicizing the diary. “My wife urged me until I finally did it,” he said of Anne Salyerds Francisco, his wife of 50 years. “She pushed and Sally pulled.”
“There were long-repressed things that Faulkner uncovered that I didn’t know were in the family,” Dr. Francisco explained, adding that his father never talked about Leak and his slave-owning past. “I just bottled all that up and forgot about it.”
Dr. Francisco said that neither he nor his father ever read much of Faulkner’s work, including “Go Down, Moses.”
“I tried to read that book years ago,” he said, “but I got so angry I threw it across the room, and it stayed there for months.” He said he now might give it another go.
The mothers of Faulkner and of Dr. Francisco’s father were close. The boys went to each other’s childhood birthday parties. Later they double dated and became hunting and drinking buddies, remaining friends until their 40s, when they drifted apart, a situation probably encouraged by Mr. Francisco’s wife, who did not approve of Faulkner’s drinking, smoking and cursing.
Professor Wolff-King had been working on a book about people who knew Faulkner and ended up connecting with Dr. Francisco because he was an alumnus of Emory. When she visited his home in Atlanta, his wife suggested he show the professor a typescript copy of the ledger. Included was a facsimile of a page that listed dollar amounts paid for individual slaves.
“At that moment I realized this diary may not only have influenced the ledger and slave sale record in ‘Go Down, Moses’ but also likely served an important source for much of William Faulkner’s work,” said Professor Wolff-King, who has spent 30 years studying the writer.
A short preview of her findings is in the fall 2009 issue of The Southern Literary Journal; her book “Ledgers of History: William Faulkner, an Almost Forgotten Friendship, and an Antebellum Diary,” is due out in June from Louisiana State University Press.
Professor Lowe reviewed the manuscript before publication. To protect against leaks the editor arranged a meeting in a coffee shop. “He gave me the manuscript in a plain brown wrapper, and I was sworn to secrecy,” he said.
“I was electrified when I was reading it,” he said. “Faulkner had a very intense and intellectual relationship with Dr. Francisco’s father,” which seems to have formed “the basis of some of the conversations you find in ‘Absalom, Absalom!’ and ‘Go Down, Moses.’ ”
The Leak papers are not unfamiliar to scholars. The family donated the journal, which includes the plantation accounts as well as descriptive sections, to the University of North Carolina in 1946 and received a typescript copy of the material that runs 1,800 pages. The original documents have been used by Southern economists and social historians for their insights into Mississippi’s plantation life, but no one has previously been aware that Faulkner, who died in 1962, had any connection to them.
Professor Wolff-King argues that elements and terms from the diary repeatedly surface in Faulkner’s work, including the ticking sound of a watch that Quentin Compson is obsessed with in “The Sound and the Fury”; descriptions of building a plantation match Thomas Sutpen’s in “Absalom, Absalom!”
Noel Polk, the editor of The Mississippi Quarterly and among the deans of Faulkner scholars, said, “I was surprised at the discovery of what is so clearly a major piece of information about his life, and maybe his work.”
He and others said it was still too early for them to gauge just how significant the diary is without reading Professor Wolff-King’s book and examining the ledgers themselves, especially when it comes to the more common details about the antebellum and Civil War eras.
“Almost every document that you can come up with that Faulkner used is interesting, but the question is what do you do with it,” Judith L. Sensibar, whose biography “Faulkner and Love: The Women Who Shaped His Art” was published last year. What does it tell us, for instance, about his “obsession with the ways in which slavery has disfigured the lives of both the slaves and their masters?” she asked.
Although literary experts have been taken aback by this unexpected find, Faulkner more than anyone would have understood how the past can unpredictably poke its nose into the present.
Labels:
African American history,
US History,
Writers
Monday, February 8, 2010
World chronicler looks inward
“Why is it that here in the United States we have such difficulty even imagining a different sort of society from the one whose dysfunctions and inequalities trouble us so?”
A link to a video of Mr. Judt's Oct. 19 lecture.
"The Trials of Tony Judt," The Chronicle of Higher Education
"Night," The New York Review of Books
February 8, 2010
A Chronicler of the World Now Looks Inward
By PATRICIA COHEN
In one of the short personal reminiscences that the historian Tony Judt has been writing for The New York Review of Books he mentions that he was part of the “lucky generation” born in the affluent West after World War II, free to indulge in daydreams and passions.
Mr. Judt’s world, sadly, has contracted considerably. Now 62, he learned about 16 months ago that he has a form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or A.L.S., commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, and since then he has lost the ability to move nearly every muscle in his body, including those that help him breathe and swallow. As he unsentimentally detailed in the first of these reminiscences published last month: “I cannot scratch an itch, adjust my spectacles, remove food particles from my teeth, or anything else that — as a moment’s reflection will confirm — we all do dozens of times a day.”
In the current and forthcoming issues Mr. Judt has followed up with further autobiographical sketches — on the overboiled English food and Indian tikkas from his youth, the subtle and complex class relations among Cambridge students and their housekeepers, and his naïve revolutionary consciousness during the ’60s — that offer a window into Mr. Judt’s sensibility and the evolution of his views.
The reflections are partly a result of his constricted circumstances. Night is by far the hardest time to bear. Mr. Judt, who has two teenage children and is married to the dance critic Jennifer Homans, has a nurse to help him through the laborious process of getting ready for and into bed. From then on, he lies motionless “like a modern-day mummy, alone in my corporeal prison, accompanied for the rest of the night only by my thoughts,” he writes.
His survival technique has been to scroll through his life and imagination to divert his mind from his body. “This cockroach-like existence,” he writes, referring to Kafka’s “Metamorphosis,” “is cumulatively intolerable even though on any given night it is perfectly manageable.”
Some of these remembrances, captured by his increasingly keen memory, have been dictated to an assistant. Robert B. Silvers, editor of The New York Review of Books, had the idea of publishing them. “I asked to see them,” he said, “and then they came one after another, two and three at a time.” Writing them is “heroic, an incomparable act of courage,” said Mr. Silvers, who has been editing Mr. Judt for 17 years. The vignettes are a link to Mr. Judt’s past as well as to the world outside of his spacious Greenwich Village apartment.
“I would say that about one-quarter of the essays so far constitute self-explanation for curious outsiders,” Mr. Judt wrote in an e-mail message. “The rest are somewhere between self-indulgence, self-interrogation and an attempt to work in a rather different literary form, blending autobiography, history and social commentary.”
His last public appearance was in October, when he delivered a lecture on social democracy before an audience of 700 at New York University, where he is a professor of European history and the director of the Remarque Institute. Wrapped in a blanket and seated in a wheelchair with a breathing device attached to his nose, Mr. Judt started off by “shooting the elephant in the house.” Some of his American friends advised that seeing him talk about A.L.S. would be uplifting, he told the audience, taking a breath after every few words, but as Mr. Judt explained, “I’m English, and we don’t do ‘uplifting.’ ”
At the moment he is turning that lecture into a small book, “Ill Fares the Land.”
Mr. Judt no longer feels up to giving interviews, but he did respond to questions by e-mail, writing that, since his illness, “my priorities are slightly reordered: the things I write about are the things that seem to me more urgent, given not just my own reduced life expectancy but a sharper appreciation of which of our contemporary dilemmas and challenges matters most.”
He added that he’s had a lot more conversations with friends about life and death: “I’m not sure I’ve learned anything new about life; but I’ve had to think harder about death and what comes after for other people.”
Mr. Judt has written nine books and scores of essays. His 878-page 2005 book, “Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945,” was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize. But he is probably most famous — or notorious, depending on your point of view — for his position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A 2003 essay in The Review of Books in which he advocated a single binational state that Israelis and Arabs would share as equal citizens thrust him into the public eye and excited often vitriolic debates. His defense of others who have been attacked for criticizing Israel has only heightened his profile among its vocal defenders.
When The Chronicle of Higher Education published a long and moving profile of Mr. Judt last month, the online comments were dominated by a bitter back and forth about the one-state solution to the Mideast conflict.
“I feel that a lot of the reading of the work has been imprecise and unfair,” ignoring the differences between short-term objectives and long-term solutions, Mr. Silvers said.
Mr. Judt was a committed left-wing Zionist as a teenager. He spent summers in Israel on a kibbutz and was active in the Jewish youth movement. But he later soured on the Zionists’ utopian vision. As he recounts of the time he spent with young soldiers, “the insouciance with which they anticipated their future occupation and domination of Arab lands terrified me even then.”
Though still a leftist, he said that his brush with Labour Zionism turned him into a lifelong skeptic of the identity politics and left-wing -isms that seduced his contemporaries. Zealous and impractical idealism draws his rancor as much as expedient politics.
He nonetheless engages in a bit of both in the book he’s writing on social democracy. “Why is it that here in the United States we have such difficulty even imagining a different sort of society from the one whose dysfunctions and inequalities trouble us so?” he asked in his October talk. From his perspective, the problem is that the United States and the West in general have become so obsessed with efficiency and productivity that they have forgotten the importance of other moral considerations, like justice, fairness and individuals’ well-being.
At the same time he recognizes that the far better world one might imagine can lead to the terrifying disasters of the past century. In this age of insecurity, he argued in his talk, a “social democracy of fear” is all one can aim for. “Imperfect improvements upon unsatisfactory circumstances are the best that we can hope for, and probably all we should seek.”
It is an observation that can serve not only as Mr. Judt’s prescription for America, but as a daily watchword for himself.
A link to a video of Mr. Judt's Oct. 19 lecture.
"The Trials of Tony Judt," The Chronicle of Higher Education
"Night," The New York Review of Books
February 8, 2010
A Chronicler of the World Now Looks Inward
By PATRICIA COHEN
In one of the short personal reminiscences that the historian Tony Judt has been writing for The New York Review of Books he mentions that he was part of the “lucky generation” born in the affluent West after World War II, free to indulge in daydreams and passions.
Mr. Judt’s world, sadly, has contracted considerably. Now 62, he learned about 16 months ago that he has a form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or A.L.S., commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, and since then he has lost the ability to move nearly every muscle in his body, including those that help him breathe and swallow. As he unsentimentally detailed in the first of these reminiscences published last month: “I cannot scratch an itch, adjust my spectacles, remove food particles from my teeth, or anything else that — as a moment’s reflection will confirm — we all do dozens of times a day.”
In the current and forthcoming issues Mr. Judt has followed up with further autobiographical sketches — on the overboiled English food and Indian tikkas from his youth, the subtle and complex class relations among Cambridge students and their housekeepers, and his naïve revolutionary consciousness during the ’60s — that offer a window into Mr. Judt’s sensibility and the evolution of his views.
The reflections are partly a result of his constricted circumstances. Night is by far the hardest time to bear. Mr. Judt, who has two teenage children and is married to the dance critic Jennifer Homans, has a nurse to help him through the laborious process of getting ready for and into bed. From then on, he lies motionless “like a modern-day mummy, alone in my corporeal prison, accompanied for the rest of the night only by my thoughts,” he writes.
His survival technique has been to scroll through his life and imagination to divert his mind from his body. “This cockroach-like existence,” he writes, referring to Kafka’s “Metamorphosis,” “is cumulatively intolerable even though on any given night it is perfectly manageable.”
Some of these remembrances, captured by his increasingly keen memory, have been dictated to an assistant. Robert B. Silvers, editor of The New York Review of Books, had the idea of publishing them. “I asked to see them,” he said, “and then they came one after another, two and three at a time.” Writing them is “heroic, an incomparable act of courage,” said Mr. Silvers, who has been editing Mr. Judt for 17 years. The vignettes are a link to Mr. Judt’s past as well as to the world outside of his spacious Greenwich Village apartment.
“I would say that about one-quarter of the essays so far constitute self-explanation for curious outsiders,” Mr. Judt wrote in an e-mail message. “The rest are somewhere between self-indulgence, self-interrogation and an attempt to work in a rather different literary form, blending autobiography, history and social commentary.”
His last public appearance was in October, when he delivered a lecture on social democracy before an audience of 700 at New York University, where he is a professor of European history and the director of the Remarque Institute. Wrapped in a blanket and seated in a wheelchair with a breathing device attached to his nose, Mr. Judt started off by “shooting the elephant in the house.” Some of his American friends advised that seeing him talk about A.L.S. would be uplifting, he told the audience, taking a breath after every few words, but as Mr. Judt explained, “I’m English, and we don’t do ‘uplifting.’ ”
At the moment he is turning that lecture into a small book, “Ill Fares the Land.”
Mr. Judt no longer feels up to giving interviews, but he did respond to questions by e-mail, writing that, since his illness, “my priorities are slightly reordered: the things I write about are the things that seem to me more urgent, given not just my own reduced life expectancy but a sharper appreciation of which of our contemporary dilemmas and challenges matters most.”
He added that he’s had a lot more conversations with friends about life and death: “I’m not sure I’ve learned anything new about life; but I’ve had to think harder about death and what comes after for other people.”
Mr. Judt has written nine books and scores of essays. His 878-page 2005 book, “Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945,” was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize. But he is probably most famous — or notorious, depending on your point of view — for his position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A 2003 essay in The Review of Books in which he advocated a single binational state that Israelis and Arabs would share as equal citizens thrust him into the public eye and excited often vitriolic debates. His defense of others who have been attacked for criticizing Israel has only heightened his profile among its vocal defenders.
When The Chronicle of Higher Education published a long and moving profile of Mr. Judt last month, the online comments were dominated by a bitter back and forth about the one-state solution to the Mideast conflict.
“I feel that a lot of the reading of the work has been imprecise and unfair,” ignoring the differences between short-term objectives and long-term solutions, Mr. Silvers said.
Mr. Judt was a committed left-wing Zionist as a teenager. He spent summers in Israel on a kibbutz and was active in the Jewish youth movement. But he later soured on the Zionists’ utopian vision. As he recounts of the time he spent with young soldiers, “the insouciance with which they anticipated their future occupation and domination of Arab lands terrified me even then.”
Though still a leftist, he said that his brush with Labour Zionism turned him into a lifelong skeptic of the identity politics and left-wing -isms that seduced his contemporaries. Zealous and impractical idealism draws his rancor as much as expedient politics.
He nonetheless engages in a bit of both in the book he’s writing on social democracy. “Why is it that here in the United States we have such difficulty even imagining a different sort of society from the one whose dysfunctions and inequalities trouble us so?” he asked in his October talk. From his perspective, the problem is that the United States and the West in general have become so obsessed with efficiency and productivity that they have forgotten the importance of other moral considerations, like justice, fairness and individuals’ well-being.
At the same time he recognizes that the far better world one might imagine can lead to the terrifying disasters of the past century. In this age of insecurity, he argued in his talk, a “social democracy of fear” is all one can aim for. “Imperfect improvements upon unsatisfactory circumstances are the best that we can hope for, and probably all we should seek.”
It is an observation that can serve not only as Mr. Judt’s prescription for America, but as a daily watchword for himself.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
A Chronicler of the World Now Looks Inward
Steve Pyke - The historian Tony Judt has A.L.S. and uses a device to help him breathe.
A link to a video of Mr. Judt's Oct. 19 lecture.
"The Trials of Tony Judt," The Chronicle of Higher Education
"Night," The New York Review of Books
February 8, 2010
A Chronicler of the World Now Looks Inward
By PATRICIA COHEN
In one of the short personal reminiscences that the historian Tony Judt has been writing for The New York Review of Books he mentions that he was part of the “lucky generation” born in the affluent West after World War II, free to indulge in daydreams and passions.
Mr. Judt’s world, sadly, has contracted considerably. Now 62, he learned about 16 months ago that he has a form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or A.L.S., commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, and since then he has lost the ability to move nearly every muscle in his body, including those that help him breathe and swallow. As he unsentimentally detailed in the first of these reminiscences published last month: “I cannot scratch an itch, adjust my spectacles, remove food particles from my teeth, or anything else that — as a moment’s reflection will confirm — we all do dozens of times a day.”
In the current and forthcoming issues Mr. Judt has followed up with further autobiographical sketches — on the overboiled English food and Indian tikkas from his youth, the subtle and complex class relations among Cambridge students and their housekeepers, and his naïve revolutionary consciousness during the ’60s — that offer a window into Mr. Judt’s sensibility and the evolution of his views.
The reflections are partly a result of his constricted circumstances. Night is by far the hardest time to bear. Mr. Judt, who has two teenage children and is married to the dance critic Jennifer Homans, has a nurse to help him through the laborious process of getting ready for and into bed. From then on, he lies motionless “like a modern-day mummy, alone in my corporeal prison, accompanied for the rest of the night only by my thoughts,” he writes.
His survival technique has been to scroll through his life and imagination to divert his mind from his body. “This cockroach-like existence,” he writes, referring to Kafka’s “Metamorphosis,” “is cumulatively intolerable even though on any given night it is perfectly manageable.”
Some of these remembrances, captured by his increasingly keen memory, have been dictated to an assistant. Robert B. Silvers, editor of The New York Review of Books, had the idea of publishing them. “I asked to see them,” he said, “and then they came one after another, two and three at a time.” Writing them is “heroic, an incomparable act of courage,” said Mr. Silvers, who has been editing Mr. Judt for 17 years.
The vignettes are a link to Mr. Judt’s past as well as to the world outside of his spacious Greenwich Village apartment.
“I would say that about one-quarter of the essays so far constitute self-explanation for curious outsiders,” Mr. Judt wrote in an e-mail message. “The rest are somewhere between self-indulgence, self-interrogation and an attempt to work in a rather different literary form, blending autobiography, history and social commentary.”
His last public appearance was in October, when he delivered a lecture on social democracy before an audience of 700 at New York University, where he is a professor of European history and the director of the Remarque Institute. Wrapped in a blanket and seated in a wheelchair with a breathing device attached to his nose, Mr. Judt started off by “shooting the elephant in the house.” Some of his American friends advised that seeing him talk about A.L.S. would be uplifting, he told the audience, taking a breath after every few words, but as Mr. Judt explained, “I’m English, and we don’t do ‘uplifting.’ ”
At the moment he is turning that lecture into a small book, “Ill Fares the Land.”
Mr. Judt no longer feels up to giving interviews, but he did respond to questions by e-mail, writing that, since his illness, “my priorities are slightly reordered: the things I write about are the things that seem to me more urgent, given not just my own reduced life expectancy but a sharper appreciation of which of our contemporary dilemmas and challenges matters most.”
He added that he’s had a lot more conversations with friends about life and death: “I’m not sure I’ve learned anything new about life; but I’ve had to think harder about death and what comes after for other people.”
Mr. Judt has written nine books and scores of essays. His 878-page 2005 book, “Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945,” was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize. But he is probably most famous — or notorious, depending on your point of view — for his position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A 2003 essay in The Review of Books in which he advocated a single binational state that Israelis and Arabs would share as equal citizens thrust him into the public eye and excited often vitriolic debates. His defense of others who have been attacked for criticizing Israel has only heightened his profile among its vocal defenders.
When The Chronicle of Higher Education published a long and moving profile of Mr. Judt last month, the online comments were dominated by a bitter back and forth about the one-state solution to the Mideast conflict.
“I feel that a lot of the reading of the work has been imprecise and unfair,” ignoring the differences between short-term objectives and long-term solutions, Mr. Silvers said.
Mr. Judt was a committed left-wing Zionist as a teenager. He spent summers in Israel on a kibbutz and was active in the Jewish youth movement. But he later soured on the Zionists’ utopian vision. As he recounts of the time he spent with young soldiers, “the insouciance with which they anticipated their future occupation and domination of Arab lands terrified me even then.”
Though still a leftist, he said that his brush with Labour Zionism turned him into a lifelong skeptic of the identity politics and left-wing -isms that seduced his contemporaries. Zealous and impractical idealism draws his rancor as much as expedient politics.
He nonetheless engages in a bit of both in the book he’s writing on social democracy. “Why is it that here in the United States we have such difficulty even imagining a different sort of society from the one whose dysfunctions and inequalities trouble us so?” he asked in his October talk. From his perspective, the problem is that the United States and the West in general have become so obsessed with efficiency and productivity that they have forgotten the importance of other moral considerations, like justice, fairness and individuals’ well-being.
At the same time he recognizes that the far better world one might imagine can lead to the terrifying disasters of the past century. In this age of insecurity, he argued in his talk, a “social democracy of fear” is all one can aim for. “Imperfect improvements upon unsatisfactory circumstances are the best that we can hope for, and probably all we should seek.”
It is an observation that can serve not only as Mr. Judt’s prescription for America, but as a daily watchword for himself.
A link to a video of Mr. Judt's Oct. 19 lecture.
"The Trials of Tony Judt," The Chronicle of Higher Education
"Night," The New York Review of Books
February 8, 2010
A Chronicler of the World Now Looks Inward
By PATRICIA COHEN
In one of the short personal reminiscences that the historian Tony Judt has been writing for The New York Review of Books he mentions that he was part of the “lucky generation” born in the affluent West after World War II, free to indulge in daydreams and passions.
Mr. Judt’s world, sadly, has contracted considerably. Now 62, he learned about 16 months ago that he has a form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or A.L.S., commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, and since then he has lost the ability to move nearly every muscle in his body, including those that help him breathe and swallow. As he unsentimentally detailed in the first of these reminiscences published last month: “I cannot scratch an itch, adjust my spectacles, remove food particles from my teeth, or anything else that — as a moment’s reflection will confirm — we all do dozens of times a day.”
In the current and forthcoming issues Mr. Judt has followed up with further autobiographical sketches — on the overboiled English food and Indian tikkas from his youth, the subtle and complex class relations among Cambridge students and their housekeepers, and his naïve revolutionary consciousness during the ’60s — that offer a window into Mr. Judt’s sensibility and the evolution of his views.
The reflections are partly a result of his constricted circumstances. Night is by far the hardest time to bear. Mr. Judt, who has two teenage children and is married to the dance critic Jennifer Homans, has a nurse to help him through the laborious process of getting ready for and into bed. From then on, he lies motionless “like a modern-day mummy, alone in my corporeal prison, accompanied for the rest of the night only by my thoughts,” he writes.
His survival technique has been to scroll through his life and imagination to divert his mind from his body. “This cockroach-like existence,” he writes, referring to Kafka’s “Metamorphosis,” “is cumulatively intolerable even though on any given night it is perfectly manageable.”
Some of these remembrances, captured by his increasingly keen memory, have been dictated to an assistant. Robert B. Silvers, editor of The New York Review of Books, had the idea of publishing them. “I asked to see them,” he said, “and then they came one after another, two and three at a time.” Writing them is “heroic, an incomparable act of courage,” said Mr. Silvers, who has been editing Mr. Judt for 17 years.
The vignettes are a link to Mr. Judt’s past as well as to the world outside of his spacious Greenwich Village apartment.
“I would say that about one-quarter of the essays so far constitute self-explanation for curious outsiders,” Mr. Judt wrote in an e-mail message. “The rest are somewhere between self-indulgence, self-interrogation and an attempt to work in a rather different literary form, blending autobiography, history and social commentary.”
His last public appearance was in October, when he delivered a lecture on social democracy before an audience of 700 at New York University, where he is a professor of European history and the director of the Remarque Institute. Wrapped in a blanket and seated in a wheelchair with a breathing device attached to his nose, Mr. Judt started off by “shooting the elephant in the house.” Some of his American friends advised that seeing him talk about A.L.S. would be uplifting, he told the audience, taking a breath after every few words, but as Mr. Judt explained, “I’m English, and we don’t do ‘uplifting.’ ”
At the moment he is turning that lecture into a small book, “Ill Fares the Land.”
Mr. Judt no longer feels up to giving interviews, but he did respond to questions by e-mail, writing that, since his illness, “my priorities are slightly reordered: the things I write about are the things that seem to me more urgent, given not just my own reduced life expectancy but a sharper appreciation of which of our contemporary dilemmas and challenges matters most.”
He added that he’s had a lot more conversations with friends about life and death: “I’m not sure I’ve learned anything new about life; but I’ve had to think harder about death and what comes after for other people.”
Mr. Judt has written nine books and scores of essays. His 878-page 2005 book, “Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945,” was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize. But he is probably most famous — or notorious, depending on your point of view — for his position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A 2003 essay in The Review of Books in which he advocated a single binational state that Israelis and Arabs would share as equal citizens thrust him into the public eye and excited often vitriolic debates. His defense of others who have been attacked for criticizing Israel has only heightened his profile among its vocal defenders.
When The Chronicle of Higher Education published a long and moving profile of Mr. Judt last month, the online comments were dominated by a bitter back and forth about the one-state solution to the Mideast conflict.
“I feel that a lot of the reading of the work has been imprecise and unfair,” ignoring the differences between short-term objectives and long-term solutions, Mr. Silvers said.
Mr. Judt was a committed left-wing Zionist as a teenager. He spent summers in Israel on a kibbutz and was active in the Jewish youth movement. But he later soured on the Zionists’ utopian vision. As he recounts of the time he spent with young soldiers, “the insouciance with which they anticipated their future occupation and domination of Arab lands terrified me even then.”
Though still a leftist, he said that his brush with Labour Zionism turned him into a lifelong skeptic of the identity politics and left-wing -isms that seduced his contemporaries. Zealous and impractical idealism draws his rancor as much as expedient politics.
He nonetheless engages in a bit of both in the book he’s writing on social democracy. “Why is it that here in the United States we have such difficulty even imagining a different sort of society from the one whose dysfunctions and inequalities trouble us so?” he asked in his October talk. From his perspective, the problem is that the United States and the West in general have become so obsessed with efficiency and productivity that they have forgotten the importance of other moral considerations, like justice, fairness and individuals’ well-being.
At the same time he recognizes that the far better world one might imagine can lead to the terrifying disasters of the past century. In this age of insecurity, he argued in his talk, a “social democracy of fear” is all one can aim for. “Imperfect improvements upon unsatisfactory circumstances are the best that we can hope for, and probably all we should seek.”
It is an observation that can serve not only as Mr. Judt’s prescription for America, but as a daily watchword for himself.
Labels:
Books,
European history,
Writers
Friday, November 20, 2009
A Nasty Way With Words
Poisoned Pens. Edited by Gary Dexter. 2009.Portly G.K. Chesterton once remarked to the exiguous George Bernard Shaw: "To look at you, anyone would think there was a famine in England." To which Shaw replied: "To look at you, anyone would think you caused it."
A monstrous snob, Vladimir Nabokov criticized Fyodor Dostoevsky for his "lack of taste." H. Rider Haggard, the author of "King Solomon's Mines," denounced Anthony Trollope (whom he met in South Africa) for being "obstinate as a pig" and filled with "peculiar ideas."
For sheer schadenfreude "Poisoned Pens" is a book that one can pick up and put down anywhere. There are some notable gaps in the collection. We see nothing of H.L. Mencken. (The focus is mainly British.) Neither is mention made of Baron Corvo, one of literature's most contumacious practitioners, a man who lived to dish and to vilify. Nor are we are treated to anything from the late Truman Capote—"That's not writing," so went his famous remark on Jack Kerouac, "that's typing"—who could have taken up a whole chapter by himself.
The nastiness is amazing. Do buy copies of "Poisoned Pens" for your curmudgeonly friends. It is a perfect Christmas book for those seeking to stem the glut of good will.
Labels:
Books,
Insults,
Nastiness,
Schadenfreude,
Writers
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Israeli Writer and Iconoclast
Amos Kenan

Mr. Kenan, who fought in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war but also belonged to the anti-Zionist and anti-religious Canaanite movement, consistently roiled Israel’s political and cultural waters as a columnist, novelist, playwright, painter, sculptor, screenwriter and filmmaker. Somehow he maintained a career as a restaurant critic as well.
Quite a Renaissance man.
He was a scathing critic of Israeli religious leaders, and when the mood suited, extended his range beyond Judaism. His play “Friends Talk About Jesus” was banned from the stage by the Israeli Supreme Court in 1972 for being unacceptably contemptuous of religion.
As the struggle for Israeli statehood gathered momentum, he joined the Lehi, referred to by the British as the Stern Gang, the most extreme of the underground paramilitary organizations in Palestine.
At the same time, influenced by the poet Yonatan Ratosh, he joined the Canaanites, a small but influential group of artists and writers who hoped to build a Hebrew rather than a Jewish state in the biblical land of Canaan that would embrace both Arabs and Jews. It regarded Judaism and Islam as retrograde, and dissociated itself from the Jewish Diaspora. He was a founder of the group’s magazine, Alef.

Mr. Kenan, who fought in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war but also belonged to the anti-Zionist and anti-religious Canaanite movement, consistently roiled Israel’s political and cultural waters as a columnist, novelist, playwright, painter, sculptor, screenwriter and filmmaker. Somehow he maintained a career as a restaurant critic as well.
Quite a Renaissance man.
He was a scathing critic of Israeli religious leaders, and when the mood suited, extended his range beyond Judaism. His play “Friends Talk About Jesus” was banned from the stage by the Israeli Supreme Court in 1972 for being unacceptably contemptuous of religion.
As the struggle for Israeli statehood gathered momentum, he joined the Lehi, referred to by the British as the Stern Gang, the most extreme of the underground paramilitary organizations in Palestine.
At the same time, influenced by the poet Yonatan Ratosh, he joined the Canaanites, a small but influential group of artists and writers who hoped to build a Hebrew rather than a Jewish state in the biblical land of Canaan that would embrace both Arabs and Jews. It regarded Judaism and Islam as retrograde, and dissociated itself from the Jewish Diaspora. He was a founder of the group’s magazine, Alef.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Genius In Exile

One morning in September 1940, a newly arrived European musician paid a visit to the conductor Otto Klemperer in Los Angeles and found him discussing Gustav Mahler with his fellow-exile Bruno Walter. The visitor went on to lunch at the new home of Thomas Mann in Pacific Palisades, where he worked on some chamber music with Mann’s son Michael, a viola player. In the evening, he dropped in on Igor Stravinsky in Hollywood, assisting in a run-through of his violin concerto.
For a brief and unrepeatable moment, an eyeblink in cultural history, the City of Angels contained the future of classical music.
Classical music is, of course, a misnomer: something is classical because it is valued for its transcendence, and is from an earlier age. This classical music is really Western European orchestral music. Much as I like it, some of it, anyway, I can not help but notice that it is a bunch of white men that are its stalwarts, its stars. Surely there was much more other music around that qualified as beautiful, transcendent; just depends where we look.
For the duration of World War II, Los Angeles was at the cutting edge of musical creation. How the frontiers of a rarified art relocated to a place ruled by sun, surf and superficial movies is the subject of “A Windfall of Musicians,” Dorothy Lamb Crawford’s engaging study, based in the main on survivor interviews and documentary archives.
The influx was provoked by Adolf Hitler, whose seizure of power on Jan. 30, 1933, soon enough meant the banishment of modern art and Jewish musicians from German public life. Hollywood offered exiled writers a chance of employment, luring in the brothers Thomas and Heinrich Mann, Bertolt Brecht, the best-selling “Grand Hotel” novelist Vicki Baum and Erich Maria Remarque, the author of the World War I classic “All’s Quiet on the Western Front.”
Musicians sought sanctuary first on the East Coast, with its venerable symphony orchestras and prestigious universities, drifting west in disillusion with the deep conservatism they encountered. Los Angeles, for all its open-air lifestyle, was no paradise. Schoenberg partnered Charles Chaplin and George Gershwin on the tennis court but found himself teaching music to “superficial and external” students, many of them concerned more with their credits than the challenge of art. Appalled by the ubiquity of commercialism, Schoenberg told the artist Oskar Kokoschka that he was living in a “world in which I nearly die of disgust.” Lotte Lehmann, a serene Lieder singer, wrote a novel called “Of Heaven, Hell and Hollywood,” leaving no doubt about the infernal realm she now inhabited.
I have searched high and low for the book, but it is not to be found, alas.
Ms. Crawford, who has spent much of her working life teaching and making music in Southern California, brings a physical familiarity to her narrative and a keen eye for poignant detail, the shock of the new. She quotes Vicki Baum’s first impression: “I stayed drunk for weeks with this sun and air and the beauty of the hills.” Ms. Crawford makes too much of minor figures like Ernst Toch and perhaps too little of Kurt Weill, whose Hollywood visits require deeper research. Nevertheless, “A Windfall of Musicians” is valuable for its account of how the West became a cultural force in America, a rising counterweight to the tradition-stifled East.
Up to a point, that is. In 1997, the trustees of the University of Southern California decided to rename the Arnold Schoenberg Institute building after a recent donor and vacate its contents. Vienna rescued the composer’s archives, his scores, his letters and his paintings, housing them in a purpose-built Arnold Schoenberg Centre. With this crowning slur to history, Los Angeles was cleansed of its modernist accident, or aberration.
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Roads to Quoz
William Least-Heat Moon's new book is Roads to Quoz. I'll get to it, soon. I still remember how much I enjoyed Blue Highways (1982).
Wednesday, November 20, 2002
Writers on writing
Another one found in my files, from New York Times.
November 20, 2000
To See Your Story Clearly, Start by Pulling the Wool Over Your Own Eyes
The habits and methods of writers are sometimes peculiar enough to be interesting.
John Cheever wrote some of his early stories in his underwear. Hemingway is said to have written some of his fiction while standing up. Thomas Wolfe reportedly wrote parts of his voluminous novels while leaning over the top of a refrigerator. Flannery O'Connor sat for two hours every day at a typewriter facing the back of a clothes dresser, so that in those last painful years, when she was dying of lupus, she'd have as close to nothing as possible to look at while she wrote her stories about sin.
Eudora Welty has said that she straight- pinned pieces of her stories together on the dining room table, as though she were pinning together parts of a dress. Maya Angelou secreted herself in a hotel room for days and weeks of concentrated isolation while she worked on her autobiographical tales. Richard Russo wrote his first novels in the secluded corners of cafes.
As for me, I prefer a coal room in the basement of our house in southern Illinois, and I write my first drafts blind on an old manual typewriter.
When we bought the house six years ago, my wife and I swept out the coal room, put in a table and shelves and laid down a piece of carpet. The room is about 6 feet by 9 and has a single ground-level window through which coal once was shoveled. Hanging from a nail above my desk is the skull of a Hereford bull, complete with horns and dark gaping eye sockets. The skull came from Cherry County, Nebraska, which is beautiful big grassy sandhill country; and if you shake the skull, you can still produce a sprinkling of sand from its calcified insides. I keep this skull hanging over my desk both for itself and because I want to think it prevents me from writing baloney.
I have a plat on the wall of the county in northeastern Colorado that is the prototype for the invented Holt County that I write about and where all of my invented people live and die and commit their acts of sudden kindness and unexpected cruelty. I have brown wrapping paper taped up on the wall, on which I make notes about whatever novel I'm working on, and I have several pictures on the wall drawn by my youngest daughter, who's an artist, and also four photographs of western landscape paintings by Keith Jacobshagen and Ben Darling, and — not least — I have on the wall a black-and-white photograph of a High Plains barbed wire fence choked with tumbleweeds.
On my desk I keep a sapling chewed by a beaver. I also keep on my desk a bird's nest, a piece of black turf from Northern Ireland, a plastic bag of red sand from the stage at the new Globe Theater (taken after the production of Shakespeare's "Winter's Tale"), a piece of brick and some paddock dirt from Faulkner's home at Rowan Oaks, an old-fashioned hand warmer in a velvet sack, a blue bandana, a jackknife that once belonged to my maternal grandfather, Roy Shaver, who was a sheep rancher in South Dakota, and an obsidian arrowhead my father found in the North Dakota Badlands, where he was born almost 100 years ago.
I do not pay much attention to these things, but having them there makes a difference. I suppose it is in some way totemic. The things on my desk and on the walls above it connect me emotionally to memories, ways of living, people and geographical areas that are important to me. It's an emotional attachment to all these things that connects me up with the impulse to write. I don't feel sentimental about these things in any sloppy way, but I do feel a strong emotion remembering things, remembering people, remembering places and sights. Every time I go down to work, I feel as if I'm descending into a sacred place.
As for the work, once I get to my office, it's done in a ritualistic, habitual way. First of all, I admit that I have a special attachment to the old pulpy yellow paper that was once used by newspaper reporters. You can't buy it anymore. Or at least I can't. But I was very lucky about seven years ago when the secretary at the university where I'd been teaching discovered six reams of it while cleaning out old cabinets, and she gave them to me. It was a great gift to me, like manna, like a propitious omen.
I'm very frugal with this old yellow paper: I type on both sides. I believe I have enough to last me the rest of my writing career. I use it only for first drafts of the scenes in novels. And then I use a manual typewriter, a Royal, with a wide carriage, and write the first draft of a scene on this yellow paper and, as I say, I write the first draft blindly.
This is not new with me. It's the old notion of blinding yourself so you can see. So you can see differently, I mean. I remove my glasses, pull a stocking cap down over my eyes, and type the first draft single-spaced on the yellow paper in the actual and metaphorical darkness behind my closed eyes, trying to avoid being distracted by syntax or diction or punctuation or grammar or spelling or word choice or anything else that would block the immediate delivery of the story.
I write an entire scene or section on one side of one page, in a very concentrated and incomplete way. I'm trying to avoid allowing the analytical part of my mind into the process too soon. Instead, I'm trying to stay in touch with subliminal, subconscious impulses and to get the story down in some spontaneous way.
I haven't always written in this peculiar manner. Formerly, like anyone else would, I wrote on a manual typewriter on yellow paper (which was still available 25 years ago) with my eyes wide open. I wrote my first novel, "The Tie That Binds," in this way. Then computers became affordable, and I wrote my second novel, "Where You Once Belonged," on a computer, but I never did like the way that felt.
I missed the tactile sensation of working with paper, the visceral rightness of it and the familiar clacking of typewriter keys. Also, it was too easy to rewrite each sentence on a computer, and I tend to rewrite endlessly, anyway. Furthermore, unless you print out constantly, you lose parts of drafts, certain phrases and sentences, that you may wish later you had saved.
So when I began to write "Plainsong," my third novel, I knew I wanted to go back to using a typewriter, at least for the first draft, and I knew I had to find a way to curb my tendency to rewrite each sentence so often that no sentence ever sounded good enough. That's when the notion of writing blind occurred to me.
It helps that I'm a decent typist. (I took a full year of typing in high school; I was the only male student in the second semester, a circumstance that was not altogether unpleasant.) Only once have I typed past the bottom of the page onto the platen, and I took that mistake as a healthy reminder to be concise. And there was only one time in my blindness that I got off the home row of my typewriter and wrote nonsense. That served as a healthy corrective, too. It's not hard to write nonsense, not much harder than it is to write slack prose.
After finishing the first draft, I work for as long as it takes (for two or three weeks, most often) to rework that first draft on a computer. Usually that involves expansion: filling in and adding to, but trying not to lose the spontaneous, direct sound. I use that first draft as a touchstone to make sure everything else in that section has the same sound, the same tone and impression of spontaneity. I revise until I feel I'm done, and then I am done with that section or scene. I don't often go back and change much after that. So when I finish the last chapter, having redrafted the last page sufficiently, I'm done with the book.
But it's important to me to maintain this impression of spontaneity. By spontaneity I mean a sense of freshness and vividness. Perhaps at times even a suggestion of awkwardness. Otherwise, to me prose sounds stilted and too polished, as if the life of it were perfected out of it. It's very difficult to arrive at this sense of freshness and spontaneity in prose — in my experience, it takes a great deal of effort and practice and years of concentrated apprenticeship — but I believe it is one of the most important attributes to achieve. That, and simplicity. And clarity. Those would be the holy trinity in the art of fiction writing.
Still, I have to say, writing is all messier and more a matter of dead ends and fits and starts than a recitation like this one makes it out to be. And perhaps because writing fiction — this weird practice of telling artful lies, this peculiar habit of inventing imaginary people who talk and move and sleep and dream and wake up and kick and kiss one another — is so bizarre in itself is the reason why writers have to find bizarre ways to make it possible even to consider doing it.
So of course they have to write in their underwear and face the backs of dressers. Of course they have to pull stocking caps down over their faces. Otherwise they might as well do something practical and ordinary, become doctors and lawyers and ditch diggers like everyone else.
November 20, 2000
To See Your Story Clearly, Start by Pulling the Wool Over Your Own Eyes
The habits and methods of writers are sometimes peculiar enough to be interesting.
John Cheever wrote some of his early stories in his underwear. Hemingway is said to have written some of his fiction while standing up. Thomas Wolfe reportedly wrote parts of his voluminous novels while leaning over the top of a refrigerator. Flannery O'Connor sat for two hours every day at a typewriter facing the back of a clothes dresser, so that in those last painful years, when she was dying of lupus, she'd have as close to nothing as possible to look at while she wrote her stories about sin.
Eudora Welty has said that she straight- pinned pieces of her stories together on the dining room table, as though she were pinning together parts of a dress. Maya Angelou secreted herself in a hotel room for days and weeks of concentrated isolation while she worked on her autobiographical tales. Richard Russo wrote his first novels in the secluded corners of cafes.
As for me, I prefer a coal room in the basement of our house in southern Illinois, and I write my first drafts blind on an old manual typewriter.
When we bought the house six years ago, my wife and I swept out the coal room, put in a table and shelves and laid down a piece of carpet. The room is about 6 feet by 9 and has a single ground-level window through which coal once was shoveled. Hanging from a nail above my desk is the skull of a Hereford bull, complete with horns and dark gaping eye sockets. The skull came from Cherry County, Nebraska, which is beautiful big grassy sandhill country; and if you shake the skull, you can still produce a sprinkling of sand from its calcified insides. I keep this skull hanging over my desk both for itself and because I want to think it prevents me from writing baloney.
I have a plat on the wall of the county in northeastern Colorado that is the prototype for the invented Holt County that I write about and where all of my invented people live and die and commit their acts of sudden kindness and unexpected cruelty. I have brown wrapping paper taped up on the wall, on which I make notes about whatever novel I'm working on, and I have several pictures on the wall drawn by my youngest daughter, who's an artist, and also four photographs of western landscape paintings by Keith Jacobshagen and Ben Darling, and — not least — I have on the wall a black-and-white photograph of a High Plains barbed wire fence choked with tumbleweeds.
On my desk I keep a sapling chewed by a beaver. I also keep on my desk a bird's nest, a piece of black turf from Northern Ireland, a plastic bag of red sand from the stage at the new Globe Theater (taken after the production of Shakespeare's "Winter's Tale"), a piece of brick and some paddock dirt from Faulkner's home at Rowan Oaks, an old-fashioned hand warmer in a velvet sack, a blue bandana, a jackknife that once belonged to my maternal grandfather, Roy Shaver, who was a sheep rancher in South Dakota, and an obsidian arrowhead my father found in the North Dakota Badlands, where he was born almost 100 years ago.
I do not pay much attention to these things, but having them there makes a difference. I suppose it is in some way totemic. The things on my desk and on the walls above it connect me emotionally to memories, ways of living, people and geographical areas that are important to me. It's an emotional attachment to all these things that connects me up with the impulse to write. I don't feel sentimental about these things in any sloppy way, but I do feel a strong emotion remembering things, remembering people, remembering places and sights. Every time I go down to work, I feel as if I'm descending into a sacred place.
As for the work, once I get to my office, it's done in a ritualistic, habitual way. First of all, I admit that I have a special attachment to the old pulpy yellow paper that was once used by newspaper reporters. You can't buy it anymore. Or at least I can't. But I was very lucky about seven years ago when the secretary at the university where I'd been teaching discovered six reams of it while cleaning out old cabinets, and she gave them to me. It was a great gift to me, like manna, like a propitious omen.
I'm very frugal with this old yellow paper: I type on both sides. I believe I have enough to last me the rest of my writing career. I use it only for first drafts of the scenes in novels. And then I use a manual typewriter, a Royal, with a wide carriage, and write the first draft of a scene on this yellow paper and, as I say, I write the first draft blindly.
This is not new with me. It's the old notion of blinding yourself so you can see. So you can see differently, I mean. I remove my glasses, pull a stocking cap down over my eyes, and type the first draft single-spaced on the yellow paper in the actual and metaphorical darkness behind my closed eyes, trying to avoid being distracted by syntax or diction or punctuation or grammar or spelling or word choice or anything else that would block the immediate delivery of the story.
I write an entire scene or section on one side of one page, in a very concentrated and incomplete way. I'm trying to avoid allowing the analytical part of my mind into the process too soon. Instead, I'm trying to stay in touch with subliminal, subconscious impulses and to get the story down in some spontaneous way.
I haven't always written in this peculiar manner. Formerly, like anyone else would, I wrote on a manual typewriter on yellow paper (which was still available 25 years ago) with my eyes wide open. I wrote my first novel, "The Tie That Binds," in this way. Then computers became affordable, and I wrote my second novel, "Where You Once Belonged," on a computer, but I never did like the way that felt.
I missed the tactile sensation of working with paper, the visceral rightness of it and the familiar clacking of typewriter keys. Also, it was too easy to rewrite each sentence on a computer, and I tend to rewrite endlessly, anyway. Furthermore, unless you print out constantly, you lose parts of drafts, certain phrases and sentences, that you may wish later you had saved.
So when I began to write "Plainsong," my third novel, I knew I wanted to go back to using a typewriter, at least for the first draft, and I knew I had to find a way to curb my tendency to rewrite each sentence so often that no sentence ever sounded good enough. That's when the notion of writing blind occurred to me.
It helps that I'm a decent typist. (I took a full year of typing in high school; I was the only male student in the second semester, a circumstance that was not altogether unpleasant.) Only once have I typed past the bottom of the page onto the platen, and I took that mistake as a healthy reminder to be concise. And there was only one time in my blindness that I got off the home row of my typewriter and wrote nonsense. That served as a healthy corrective, too. It's not hard to write nonsense, not much harder than it is to write slack prose.
After finishing the first draft, I work for as long as it takes (for two or three weeks, most often) to rework that first draft on a computer. Usually that involves expansion: filling in and adding to, but trying not to lose the spontaneous, direct sound. I use that first draft as a touchstone to make sure everything else in that section has the same sound, the same tone and impression of spontaneity. I revise until I feel I'm done, and then I am done with that section or scene. I don't often go back and change much after that. So when I finish the last chapter, having redrafted the last page sufficiently, I'm done with the book.
But it's important to me to maintain this impression of spontaneity. By spontaneity I mean a sense of freshness and vividness. Perhaps at times even a suggestion of awkwardness. Otherwise, to me prose sounds stilted and too polished, as if the life of it were perfected out of it. It's very difficult to arrive at this sense of freshness and spontaneity in prose — in my experience, it takes a great deal of effort and practice and years of concentrated apprenticeship — but I believe it is one of the most important attributes to achieve. That, and simplicity. And clarity. Those would be the holy trinity in the art of fiction writing.
Still, I have to say, writing is all messier and more a matter of dead ends and fits and starts than a recitation like this one makes it out to be. And perhaps because writing fiction — this weird practice of telling artful lies, this peculiar habit of inventing imaginary people who talk and move and sleep and dream and wake up and kick and kiss one another — is so bizarre in itself is the reason why writers have to find bizarre ways to make it possible even to consider doing it.
So of course they have to write in their underwear and face the backs of dressers. Of course they have to pull stocking caps down over their faces. Otherwise they might as well do something practical and ordinary, become doctors and lawyers and ditch diggers like everyone else.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










